|
The Next Great Earthquake
Geophysicist urges public, policy makers to consider
all tectonic boundaries as lethal
Troy, N.Y. — The 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and
resulting tsunami are now infamous for the damage they caused,
but at the time many scientists believed this area was unlikely
to create a quake of such magnitude. In the March 23 issue of
the journal Science, a geophysicist from Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute urges the public and policy makers to
consider all subduction-type tectonic boundaries to be “locked,
loaded, and dangerous.”
“Seismologists have long tried to determine which subduction
boundaries are more likely than others to break,” says Robert
McCaffrey, professor of earth and environmental sciences at
Rensselaer. “Yet, the great earthquake of 2004 ruptured a
segment that was thought to be among the least likely to
go.”
On Dec. 26, 2004, the earth beneath the Indian Ocean buckled
and ruptured, unleashing one of the largest earthquakes in
recorded history. Shockwaves from the magnitude 9.2 (M9) quake
created a wall of rushing water that devastated communities up
to 1,000 miles away.
M9 earthquakes typically occur at a specific type of
tectonic boundary called a subduction zone, where one plate is
gently slipping underneath another plate, which causes
friction, cracking, and lifting of the plates. An M9 earthquake
can be created by only 20 meters of slip between two converging
plates — less then the length of an 18-wheeler truck — but its
effects can be global in their impact.
Slips of this length only occur every 200 to 1,000 years or
more at a particular boundary, leaving no reliable historic
records to track their frequency, McCaffrey notes. Complete
records are only available going back 100 years. Scientists had
widely accepted that the age and speed of the subducting plate
is important in creating M9 earthquakes, based primarily on
support from this 100-year historical record.
But this narrow understanding put the Sumatran subduction
zone in a very low risk category. McCaffrey suggests that such
limited records are incapable of mapping a trend in geological
events that could be several centuries or more apart.
Geologists also focused on the temperature of subduction
zones, indicating that temperature at the plate convergence
region plays a strong role in the strength of a resulting
earthquake. These thermal considerations place the Andaman
subduction zone in the high-magnitude class, but one pitfall
with this type of classification is that it characterizes some
subduction zones as being incapable of producing an
M9.
“[The day of the quake], Earth gave us a stark reminder of
the important difference between improbability and
impossibility,” McCaffrey says. “Our understanding of where and
when the next great earthquake will happen is in its infancy at
best. We have not had enough time to decipher M9
behavior.”
In creating new public policy, McCaffrey urges officials to
consider all subduction zones as lethal. “Several are near
densely populated land areas, and the potential impacts of
shaking and tsunamis cannot be overstated,” he
says.
When crafting warning systems, policy makers should always
remember that an earthquake even hundreds of miles removed can
create a tsunami capable of widespread destruction, McCaffrey
says. Therefore warning systems need to be created with input
and support from many countries, in addition to educational
outreach to coastal communities. “These systems need to be
strong and they need to be maintained over the long term
because we have no way of knowing when the next great
earthquake will hit,” he says.
“We can never forget what happened,” McCaffrey continues.
“Now is the time to use the knowledge that we have gained and
work to save lives should another M9 hit tomorrow or hundreds
of years from now. Many didn’t know about tsunamis before the
quake; we must make sure that now they never fail to remember
their destructive force.”
McCaffrey’s research focuses on plate motion, crustal
deformation, and seismology. He is currently researching the
movement of tectonic plates using global positioning systems
(GPS). Among his many research projects, he has used GPS to
track the movement of tectonic plates in and around Indonesia
and Sumatra since 1989 and noted that the subduction zone was
steadily squeezing the island of Sumatra, loading the system
for an earthquake. No one predicted how soon and how big the
earthquake would be. McCaffrey later explained the build-up to
the earthquake as a time when one plate stuck against its
counterpart. The energy and pressure built and the system
cracked, causing the now historical M9.
|
Published
March 22,
2007 |
Contact: Gabrielle DeMarco
Phone: (518) 276-6542
E-mail: demarg@rpi.edu |
|