Protecting the World from the Next Great Earthquake
Subduction Zones (blue curves) and
tectonic boundaries (brown curves) with filled circles
showing locations of known earthquakes of M7.5 or greater
since 1900
Credit: Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute/Robert
McCaffrey
|
The 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake and resulting tsunami
are now infamous for the damage they caused, but at the time
many scientists believed this area was unlikely to create a
quake of such magnitude. In the March 23 issue of the journal
Science, geophysicist Robert McCaffrey urges the
public and policy makers to consider all subduction-type
tectonic boundaries to be “locked, loaded, and dangerous.”
“The great earthquake of 2004 ruptured a segment that was
thought to be among the least likely to go,” says McCaffrey,
professor of earth and environmental sciences at
Rensselaer.
On Dec. 26, 2004, the earth beneath the Indian Ocean buckled
and ruptured, unleashing one of the largest earthquakes in
recorded history. Shockwaves from the magnitude 9.2 (M9) quake
created a wall of rushing water that devastated communities up
to 1,000 miles away.
M9 earthquakes typically occur at a specific type of
tectonic boundary called a subduction zone, where one plate is
gently slipping underneath another plate. An M9 earthquake can
be created by only 20 meters of slip between two converging
plates — less then the length of an 18-wheeler truck — but its
effects can be global in their impact.
Slips of this length only occur every 200 to 1,000 years or
more at a particular boundary, leaving no reliable historic
records to track their frequency, McCaffrey notes. Complete
records are only available going back 100 years. Scientists had
widely accepted that the age and speed of the subducting plate
is important in creating M9 earthquakes, based primarily on
support from this 100-year historical record.
But this narrow understanding put the Sumatran subduction
zone in a very low risk category. McCaffrey suggests that such
limited records are incapable of mapping a trend in geological
events that could be several centuries or more apart.
Geologists also focused on the temperature of subduction
zones, indicating that temperature at the plate convergence
region plays a strong role in the strength of a resulting
earthquake. These thermal considerations place the Andaman
subduction zone in the high-magnitude class, but one pitfall
with this type of classification is that it characterizes some
subduction zones as being incapable of producing an M9.
In creating new public policy, McCaffrey urges officials to
consider all subduction zones as lethal. When crafting warning
systems, policy makers should always remember that an
earthquake even hundreds of miles removed can create a tsunami
capable of widespread destruction, McCaffrey says. Therefore
warning systems need to be created with input and support from
many countries, in addition to educational outreach to coastal
communities. “These systems need to be strong and they need to
be maintained over the long term because we have no way of
knowing when the next great earthquake will hit,” he
says.
McCaffrey’s research focuses on plate motion, crustal
deformation, and seismology. Among his many research projects,
he has used GPS to track the movement of tectonic plates in and
around Indonesia and Sumatra since 1989. He noted that the
subduction zone was steadily squeezing the island of Sumatra,
loading the system for an earthquake. No one predicted how soon
and how big the earthquake would be.
National Public Radio’s “Science Friday” story about
McCaffrey’s research
Published
March 26,
2007
|