|
Circadian Math: One Plus One Doesn’t Always Equal Two
Like a wristwatch that needs to be wound daily for accurate
time-telling, the human circadian system — the biological
cycles that repeat approximately every 24 hours — requires
daily light exposure to the eye’s retina to remain synchronized
with the solar day. In a new study published in the June issue
of Neuroscience Letters, researchers have demonstrated
that when it comes to the circadian system, not all light
exposure is created equal.
The findings have profound implications for exploring how
lighting can be used to adjust our bodies’ clocks, and they
could redefine the way lighting is manufactured, according to
Mariana Figueiro, lead author of the paper and assistant
professor in the Lighting Research Center (LRC) at Rensselaer
Polytechnic Institute.
Short-wavelength light, including natural light from the
blue sky, is highly effective at stimulating the circadian
system. Exposure to other wavelengths — and thus colors — of
light may necessitate longer exposure times or require higher
exposure levels to be as effective at “winding the
watch.”
In some instances, exposure to multiple wavelengths (colors)
of light simultaneously can result in less total stimulation to
the circadian system than would result if either color were
viewed separately, a phenomenon known as “spectral opponency.”
The LRC scientists have shown that the circadian system shares
neurons in the retina — which exhibit spectral opponency and
form the foundation for our perception of color — with the
visual system. Thus, in principle, the circadian system may be
able to distinguish between lights of different
colors.
More than meets the eye
To demonstrate that the circadian system exhibited
spectral opponency formed in the retina, the researchers
exposed 10 subjects to three experimental conditions: one unit
of blue light to the left eye plus one unit of green light to
the right eye; one unit of blue light to the right eye plus one
unit of green light to the left eye; and half a unit of blue
light plus half a unit of green light to both eyes and then
measured each individual’s melatonin levels, a natural
indicator of the circadian clock.
“The first two conditions — exposure to a single color in
each eye — did not result in a significant difference in
melatonin suppression, while the third condition — exposure to
both colors in both eyes — resulted in significantly less
melatonin suppression,” said Figueiro. “Even though the amount
of light at the eye was the same in all three conditions, when
the two colors of light were combined in the same eye, the
response of the system was reduced due to spectral opponent
mechanisms formed in the retina.”
This indicates that spectral opponency is a fundamental
characteristic of how the human retina converts light into
neural signals in the human circadian system, according to
Figueiro.
The findings also verify the accuracy of a new
quantification system LRC researchers developed in 2006 to
calculate the “circadian efficacy” of different light sources.
Called the model of human circadian phototransduction, the tool
correctly predicted the circadian system response demonstrated
under each of the three experimental conditions.
The model appears to correctly predict the circadian
response to any light source, and can be used as the foundation
for a new system of circadian photometry, much like the current
system of photometry based on human vision.
Quantification of light as a stimulus for the circadian
system provide new scientific insights into how the human body
processes light for the circadian system, according to
Figueiro.
Nocturnal melatonin, a hormone produced at night and under
conditions of darkness, is used as a marker for the circadian
clock. Scientific evidence suggests that disruption of the
circadian system — and thus the melatonin cycle — may result in
increased malignant tumor growth, as well as poor sleep
quality, lack of alertness, seasonal depression, and immune
deficiencies.
Now that the model can predict circadian efficacy for any
light source, Figueiro and her research partners have begun
studying the way time of night affects the potency of light
exposure. Once complete, the comprehensive model will allow
manufacturers to develop light sources that most effectively
stimulate and, importantly, do not stimulate the
circadian system.
Figueiro’s research was supported by a $200,000 grant from
the New York State Office of Science, Technology, and Academic
Research (NYSTAR), which awarded her the James D. Watson
Investigator award in 2007.
The Watson awards are designed to recognize and support
outstanding scientists and engineers who show potential for
leadership and scientific discovery early in their careers in
the fields of biotechnology, according to Michael J. Relyea,
executive director of NYSTAR.
Figueiro conducted her research with LRC Director Mark Rea,
and Senior Research Scientist Andrew Bierman, who are coauthors
on the paper.
|
Published
June 6,
2008 |
Contact: Amber Cleveland
Phone: (518) 276-2146
E-mail: clevea@rpi.edu |
|