Stochasticity – Inherent Fluctuations in Materials Merit Exploration
Stochasticity – Inherent Fluctuations in Materials Merit Exploration
Researchers propose new focus of study in materials
Scientists and engineers who work with materials – metals, polymers, ceramics, composites, and glasses – know that at some scale, predictive ability breaks down amid the fluctuations known as “stochasticity.” On the atomic scale for example, even the most perfect crystal has thermodynamic fluctuations, in the form of “point defects” – atoms missing from the crystal lattice. In another example, the atoms within an alloy material may distribute in many ways: an alloy made of silicon germanium, may be half and half of each element overall, but with stochastic fluctuations the ratio in which those elements are found varies at different length scales throughout the material.
In a paper published in Applied Physics Reviews, a group of researchers at Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, pointing to four underlying causes of such fluctuations that span materials, argue that stochasticity is inherent to all materials and merits greater exploration as a field of study.
“We propose a new framework for understanding stochasticity as an important unifying phenomenon across materials,” said Robert Hull, the Henry Burlage Professor of Engineering and director of the Rensselaer Center for Materials, Devices, and Integrated Systems, and lead author of the paper. “There is an opportunity in taking a larger view of stochasticity – in expanding our view from individual observations based on a sole class of materials to a broader perspective across materials – for greater control over both the challenges and potential benefits it offers in materials science and engineering.”
Hull was joined on the paper by Rensselaer colleagues Pawel Kelinski, professor and head of materials science and engineering; Dan Lewis, associate professor in materials science and engineering; Antoinette Maniatty, professor of mechanical, aerospace, and nuclear engineering; Vincent Meunier, the Jeffrey L. Kodosky ’70 Career Development Constellation Chair and head of physics, applied physics, and astronomy; Assad A. Oberai, former associate dean of the School of Engineering, now at the University of Southern California; Catalin Picu, associate head mechanical, aerospace, and nuclear engineering; Johnson Samuel, associate professor of mechanical, aerospace, and nuclear engineering; Mark S. Shephard, the Elisabeth C. and Samuel A. Johnson ‘37 Professor in Engineering; Minoru Tomozawa, professor of materials science and engineering; Deepak Vashishth, director of the Rensselaer Center for Biotechnology and Interdisciplinary Studies; and Shengbai Zhang, the senior Gail and Jeffrey L. Kodosky ‘70 Chair in Physics, Information Technology, and Entrepreneurship.
All materials exhibit stochasticity at some time or length scale, but materials scientists typically confront those fluctuations on a case-by-case basis, while the broader implications of stochasticity remain under-explored, Hull said.
“The fact that the internal structure of materials at some time or length scale becomes non-uniform and non-predictable is a phenomenon which underpins almost all that we do, and yet we only have piecemeal information on its effects,” Hull said. “We think materials stochasticity as a distinct field of study could yield valuable insights that will advance our ability to understand and manipulate materials.”
The paper reviews four “broad classes” of stochasticity in materials: thermodynamic fluctuations, structural/compositional fluctuations, kinetic fluctuations, and frustration/degeneracy. It also considers stochastic effects arising from imprecision in measurement and uncertainties in modeling and simulation.
Kinetic fluctuations, for example, are temporal fluctuations in the development of the internal structure of materials (the “materials microstructure”). A well-known example is seen in metallurgy, where heat and stress are used to alter the internal structure of metallic alloys such as steel. On a microscopic level, steel, made of iron and carbon and other elements, forms locally distinct regions called “grains” and “phases.” The distribution of grains and phases and their characteristic sizes are dependent on kinetic fluctuations during the processing of the material and affect critical engineering properties like tensile strength and ductility. The history of steel processing, spanning millennia, is essentially an attempt to use heat and stress to control grain size and phase distribution and therefore optimize its properties.
Steel manufacturers are adept at applying specific techniques to yield a consistent product, but a more precise understanding of kinetic fluctuations could create new predictable variants of materials microstructure with improved or new properties. Research into the three other classes of materials stochasticity offers similar promise.
As a remedy, the researchers propose stochasticity as a field of study and also offer a mathematical framework for describing materials stochasticity. This framework, said Hull, makes it possible to consider stochasticity under a unifying methodology.
Finally, the researchers perceive potential advantages to harnessing stochasticity. Typically, the fluctuations of stochasticity are considered a challenge to be controlled and mitigated. But it’s possible, the researchers wrote, that a greater understanding of stochasticity will reveal situations under which the inherent fluctuations of materials yield new materials properties.
“Nature has given us a finite number of elements, and ways to combine them,” Hull said. “Perhaps, within stochasticity, we can find new degrees of freedom within the material set which have previously been unrecognized.”
“Stochasticity in materials structure, properties, and processing—A review” appeared in the March 2018 edition of Applied Physics Reviews.
Research on stochasticity fulfills The New Polytechnic, an emerging paradigm for higher education which recognizes that global challenges and opportunities are so great they cannot be adequately addressed by even the most talented person working alone. Rensselaer serves as a crossroads for collaboration — working with partners across disciplines, sectors, and geographic regions — to address complex global challenges, using the most advanced tools and technologies, many of which are developed at Rensselaer. Research at Rensselaer addresses some of the world’s most pressing technological challenges — from energy security and sustainable development to biotechnology and human health. The New Polytechnic is transformative in the global impact of research, in its innovative pedagogy, and in the lives of students at Rensselaer.
About Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, founded in 1824, is America’s first technological research university. For nearly 200 years, Rensselaer has been defining the scientific and technological advances of our world. Rensselaer faculty and alumni represent 86 members of the National Academy of Engineering, 18 members of the National Academy of Sciences, 25 members of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 8 members of the National Academy of Medicine, 8 members of the National Academy of Inventors, and 5 members of the National Inventors Hall of Fame, as well as 6 National Medal of Technology winners, 5 National Medal of Science winners, and a Nobel Prize winner in Physics. With 7,000 students and nearly 100,000 living alumni, Rensselaer is addressing the global challenges facing the 21st century—to change lives, to advance society, and to change the world. To learn more, go to www.rpi.edu.